Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(1990) Synthese 85 (1).
Can a present or future event bring about a past event? An answer to this question is demanded by many other interesting questions. Can anybody, even a god, do anything about what has already occurred? Should we plan for the past, as well as for the future? Can anybody precognise the future in a way quite different from normal prediction? Do the causal laws and the past jointly preclude free action? Does current physical theory entail a consistent version of backwards causation? Recent articles on the problem of backwards causation have drawn attention to the importance of the principle of the fixity of the past: that the past is now fixed. It can be shown that the standard argument against backwards causation (the bilking experiment) simply builds in the assumption of past fixity. A fixed past deprives future events of past efficacy. This has naturally led to the speculation that by abandoning past fixity real power over the past may be possible.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/BF00873195
Full citation:
Oddie, G. (1990). Backwards causation and the permanence of the past. Synthese 85 (1), pp. 71-93.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.