Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2016) Synthese 193 (9).
In defense of proper functionalism
cognitive science takes on swampman
Kenny Boyce, Andrew Moon
pp. 2987-3001
According to proper functionalist theories of warrant, a belief is warranted only if it is formed by cognitive faculties that are properly functioning according to a good, truth-aimed design plan, one that is often thought to be specified either by intentional design or by natural selection. A formidable challenge to proper functionalist theories is the Swampman objection, according to which there are scenarios involving creatures who have warranted beliefs but whose cognitive faculties are not properly functioning, or are poorly designed, or are not aimed at truth. In this paper, we draw lessons from cognitive science in order to develop a novel argument for the conclusion that the Swampman objection fails against proper functionalist theories of warrant. Our argument not only shows that the underlying, central intuition motivating Swampman-like scenarios is false but also motivates proper function as a necessary condition for warrant, thereby lending support to the claim that any theory of knowledge that lacks a proper function requirement is false.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0899-6
Full citation:
Boyce, K. , Moon, A. (2016). In defense of proper functionalism: cognitive science takes on swampman. Synthese 193 (9), pp. 2987-3001.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.