Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2012) Synthese 188 (2).
In this paper, I argue that the rejection of doxastic voluntarism is not as straightforward as its opponents take it to be. I begin with a critical examination of William Alston’s defense of involuntarism and then focus on the question of whether belief is intentional.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9919-3
Full citation:
Steup, M. (2012). Belief control and intentionality. Synthese 188 (2), pp. 145-163.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.