Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles

This paper is a reply to some of Scott Soames' comments on my colloquium paper “Marcus, Kripke, and the Origin of the New Theory of Reference’. Except for the indicated parts added in May, 1995, this paper was written on December 16th–25th, 1994 as my reply to Soames for the APA colloquium in Boston, December 28, 1994. In this paper, I argue that Soames' contention that Marcus is not one of the “primary founders of contemporary nondescriptivist theories of reference” is false. Soames presents numerous arguments for his thesis that Marcus did not originate ideas later elaborated upon by Kripke, but his arguments are unsound; they are based in part on a misunderstanding of Marcus' theory and in part on an inadequate grasp of some of the key notions of the New Theory of Reference, such as the notion of a posteriori necessities and the notion of reference-fixing descriptions.

DOI: 10.1007/BF01063871

Full citation: