Soft facts

thinking practices and the architecture of reality

Hilan Nissor Bensusan , Manuel de Pinedo

pp. 7-21

It is common to criticize the idea of objectivity by claiming that we cannot make sense of any cognitive contact with the world that is not constituted by the very materials of our thinking, and to conclude that the idea must be abandoned and that the world is ‘well lost’. We resist this conclusion and argue for a notion of objectivity that places its source within the domain of thoughts by proposing a conception of facts, akin to McDowell’s, as thinkable while independent of any act of thinking. However, we do so without any empiricist commitment.

Publication details

DOI: 10.6018/daimon/163921

Full citation:

Nissor Bensusan, H. , de Pinedo, M. (2014). Soft facts: thinking practices and the architecture of reality. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia 61, pp. 7-21.

This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.