John Searle
Bègue, D. (1983). Ellipse et sens littéral chez Searle. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 5 (1), 135-141.
Holenstein, E. (1984). Searle no haikei. Genshōgaku nenpō: Annual Review of the Phenomenological Association of Japan, 1, 97-132.
Noe, S. (1985). Posto-Gengobunseki-no tetsugaku: Saru to Horenshutain. Risō, 620, 60-66.
Lories, D. (1988). L'intentionalité comme oubli de la chose même: La perception chez Austin et Searle. Études phénoménologiques, 4 (7), 81-121. https://doi.org/10.5840/etudphen1988478.
Jacquette, D. (1989). Searle's intentionality thesis. Synthese, 80 (2), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869487.
Corredor Lanas, C. (1993). Intentos de formulación de una teoría general de actos de habla (J. Searle y J. Habermas). Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 6, 119-130.
Pachaud, B. (1995). Conceptions téléologiques de l'intentionnalité selon E. Husserl et selon J. Searle et leurs implications temporelles. Archives de philosophie, 58 (4), 549-562.
Kim, J. (1995). Mental causation in Searle's "biological naturalism". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1), 189-194.
Garrett, B. (1995). Non-reductionism and John Searle's the rediscovery of the mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1), 209-215.
Burton, R. G. (1995). Searle on rediscovering the mind. Man and World, 28 (2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01278943.
Melnyk, A. (1996). Searle's abstract argument against strong AI. Synthese, 108 (3), 391-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413696.
Beyer, C. (1997). Hussearle's representationalism and the "hypothesis of the background". Synthese, 112 (3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004992424269.
Ruben, D. (1997). John Searle's the construction of social reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, 443-447.
Tuomela, R. (1997). Searle on social institutions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, 435-441.
Cunning, D. (1999). Agency and consciousness. Synthese, 120 (2), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005192006642.
Kenaan, H. (2002). Language, philosophy and the risk of failure: rereading the debate between Searle and Derrida. Continental Philosophy Review, 35 (2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016583115826.
Marcoulatos, I. (2003). John Searle and Pierre Bourdieu: divergent perspectives on intentionality and social ontology. Human Studies, 26 (1), 67-96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022579615814.
Francis, D. (2005). Using Wittgenstein to respecify constructivism. Human Studies, 28 (3), 251-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-7423-9.
Didderen, D. (2006). Itérabilité et parasitisme: Essai sur le débat entre Searle et Derrida autour du langage et de l'intentionnalité. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique, 2 (4), 3-182.
Taylor, C. (2007). Searle and Foucault on truth. Symposium, 11 (2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium200711240.
Novotny, D. D. (2007). Searle on the unity of the world. Axiomathes, 17 (1), 41-51.
Fugali, E. (2011). Husserl e Searle su intenzionalità e coscienza: la fenomenologia è veramente un'illusione? Rivista di estetica, 47, 113-153. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1906.
Raffel, S. (2011). Understanding each other: the case of the Derrida-Searle debate. Human Studies, 34 (3), 277-. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9189-6.
(2012). "Fenomenologia dell'istituzionale": does "to institutionalize" something mean, in fact, to document it? Rivista di estetica, 50, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1465.
Smith, B. (2012). How to do things with documents. Rivista di estetica, 50, 179-198. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1480.
Ferraris, M. (2012). Intenzionalità e documentalità. Rivista di estetica, 49, 161-182. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1706.
Giovagnoli, R. (2012). Intenzionalità vs. testualismo debole. Rivista di estetica, 50, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1470.
Ostritsch, S. (2014). Hegel and Searle on the necessity of social reality. Rivista di estetica, 57, 205-218. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.764.
Zimmermann, S. (2014). Is society built on collective intentions?: a response to Searle. Rivista di estetica, 57, 121-141. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.709.
Kara-Pešić, I. (2014). Liberi dal presente: Le basi cognitive del mondo sociale. Rivista di estetica, 57, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.750.
Lorini, G. (2014). Meta-institutional concepts: a new category for social ontology. Rivista di estetica, 56, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.876.
Jerez, J. (2014). Notes on a new analogical realism. Rivista di estetica, 57, 251-256. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.777.
Bartmann, M. (2014). On the very idea of imposition: some remarks on Searle's social ontology. Rivista di estetica, 57, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.724.
Nasuto, S. J. , Roesch, E. B. , Spencer, M. C. (2015). Zombie mouse in a Chinese room. Philosophy & Technology , 28 (2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0150-2.
Strobach, N. (2016). An angry young man. Synthese, 193 (11), 3417-3427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0901-3.
Hammond, P. (2016). Distinguishing joint actions from collective actions. Synthese, 193 (9), 2707-2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0876-0.
Endreß, M. (2016). On the very idea of social construction: deconstructing Searle's and Hacking's critical reflections. Human Studies, 39 (1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9395-3.
Weber, M. (2017). How objective are biological functions? Synthese, 194 (12), 4741-4755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1483-z.